|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CEOCFO Monthly Analyst |
Analyst Industry Review December 2000 Biotechnology & Drugs Diagnostic Devices ANALYST INDUSTRY REVIEW Ms. Mya Wagle - Equity Analyst -
RedChip.com, Inc. Interview conducted by: CEOCFOinterviews.com December 2000 CEOCFOinterviews
- Give a brief career history. Ms. Wagle I
cover stocks in the Healthcare arena ranging from diagnostic devices to biotech companies. These are the sectors that I like to cover because
my background is as a trained Biochemist. I
have spent extensive time getting postgraduate work done in that area as well as business school.
I also spent some time with health regulators in state health departments and
insurance companies. I enjoy putting
everything that Ive learned together in a package as an Equity Analyst at
RedChip. CEOCFOinterviews - Can you take us
through the steps of what it takes a biotech company to bring a new drug to the market
place? Ms. Wagle The
steps that a company has to go through to bring a drug to market is as follows: they must
put it through an INDA or an investigational new drug application. After a few studies on it you then put in for
an NDA, which is a new drug application and in between all of that you have the clinical
trials, Phase I, Phase II and Phase III, with each clinical trial taking a minimum of
about twelve to eighteen months. So if
youve got an investigational drug application through the FDA, which normally takes
about four to six months, then you start your studies and your clinical trials, with every
Phase taking eighteen months, five years has just past right there. Once a study is over you have to put all of the
data together and focus on how you will plan the next study, because things may have
cropped up in that study which you will want to address in the next study. So there will be a period of about a four to six
month waiting period before you start the next study, in which you chew on the data and
then plan your next Phase. So thats the
reason why it takes any biotech company a minimum of five to seven years to get a new drug
out, and most of these companies dont turn profitable until about the second year
after theyve started selling the drug.
CEOCFOinterviews - Why do you like
the healthcare sector and why should an investor be interested in diagnostic devices and
biotech stock? Ms. Wagle When
I grew up my father always said that you make money for two reasons. One is to feed your family and the other is for
your basic health, because if you dont have health you cant enjoy anything
else that you have. The desire to help people
live longer may also be the reason why we have so many different areas of research, and
scientists tend to do research in areas that are of concern to them. In the twentieth century weve seen advances
in antibiotics and now drug resistant bacteria, with scientists trying to get to the drug
resistant bacteria through biotech means. We
also now have major advances in the understanding of the human DNA, with scientists trying
to get at the root of the cause of so many diseases.
So biotech becomes the key to the search for a solution to diseases. I
think investors should look at biotech stock because the companies are trying to get at
the root of the matter, but trying to get at the root of the matter is always longer than
going over it superficially. For example,
instead of just putting a band aid on a cut, or simply treating the symptoms, some
companies are researching into genetics to find out which genes could be responsible for
certain diseases. Once they get to a gene
that has gone wrong, they may try to correct the gene or create a compound in such a way
that it counteracts the effect of the malfunctioning gene. To do all of this requires many resources in
money and intellect, and in todays capitalistic society, scientific research is done
by only a few people. There are more people
in business than there are in scientific research.
Not too many people are willing to put in those long pain staking days at the lab
bench, its almost like a labor of love, so they need support in their effort to try
to find the cause for diseases.
When it comes to biotech
stock, in terms of the research, clinical studies and getting approval for a new drug,
therapy or device before a company can even bring it to the market place, it is a long
process. I like to think of it, as, instead
of a mother going through a nine-month pregnancy, she has to go through it for nine years. A long term pregnancy and even longer labor
process, but at the end there is always that wonderful baby. CEOCFOinterviews - What is the
upside and reward like for the investor who is willing to wait through this long process? Ms. Wagle The
upside can be unbelievable. Lets just
take Amgen, Inc. (NASD: AMGN) into account. Amgen
has Epogen ® and Neupogen, and these are factors to help stimulate the production of your
red blood supply. Many times during surgery,
the patient loses blood-causing anemia. Well
there was no real solution to this problem until Amgen came along with a biotech product
that is similar to the one that your body produces and which could be injected into a
patient. Sometimes even a transfusion does
not work as well, because this is a purely genetic product that could save someone. Its like a flashlight going off
when the product is finally on the market. We
can use it here, we can use it there, and so they generally find out that there are
multiple uses for it, even widening its market. If
the investor wants something worthwhile like a scientist working in the lab, working
towards this greater goal, the investor must be patient.
With biotech companies its not only the effort, the brain power and the
monetary resources, but its also like Edison said, success is one percent
inspiration ninety nine percent perspiration, and I think that statement which was
true at the beginning of the twentieth century, should be applied now at the beginning of
the twenty first century. CEOCFOinterviews - What should an
investor look for in the management team of a biotech company? Ms. Wagle Of
the basic principals of investing, number one is that management has to be focused,
promoting from within and especially with biotech companies, the scientist have to have
creative license. They need an
entrepreneurial CEO who can look at the scientific as well as the business side of things,
because after the scientist has created a product, you need someone to sell it. Therefore, the CEO has to be alert in forming
relationships, especially with the smaller biotech company who will need to liaison with a
large pharmaceutical firm to bring a product to the market.
The CEO has to be
developing those helping hands
along the way and cant wait
until he or she is at the end of Phase III to try and do this.
CEOCFOinterviews - Which of the
companies that you follow, do you feel meet those criteria of having a strong management
team and forming those important alliances? Ms. Wagle
Targeted Genetics Corp. (NASD: TGEN), in Seattle has done a good job at forming
alliances. Their CEO Ms. Steward Parker has
been a fascinating ambassador, linking up with the big pharmaceutical companies these
days. They have an alliance with Biogen
Inc. (NASD: BGEN), one with Elan Pharmaceuticals (Elan Corporation, plc, NYSE: ELN) and
yesterday I received an email saying that they now have an alliance with American Home
Products. These are fabulous large companies,
who know how to sell, who know how to market to their target audience and they have a
sales force in place. This is what was
necessary for a small company like Targeted Genetics, which does not have any sales force. Targeted Genetics now has a product in Phase III
clinical trials, and along with Corixa Corporation (NASD: CRXA) were spin-offs of Immunex
Corporation (NASD: IMNX), also based in Seattle. Another company that I cover
called NeoRx Corporation (NASD: NERX), had problem with one of their products during a
Phase II trial and their stock dropped when the FDA stopped the study, but I believe they
will recover because of their management team. They
have a very sharp CEO, Paul G. Abrams. He is
an MD himself and a JD, so we have to realize that he knows the medical and the legal
implications. Hes a brilliant man who
is also very good at business, so hes been able to nurture this company for the last
eight years. Hes facing a tough battle
to get this company up and going, but knowing him Im sure hes going to see
what went wrong and where. CEOCFOinterviews - What other basic
principals of investing should be looked at when considering a biotech or diagnostic
device company? Ms. Wagle Of
the basic principals number one is management, number two is product, number three is
ensuring that they have the proper mechanism in place to nurture the product, and number
four would be numbers, such as earnings and sales, but to get those earnings and sales
they must have the proper mechanism. CEOCFOinterviews - What aspects do
you consider when you look at a companies technology or product? Ms. Wagle One
of the important things that I look for when I decide to cover a company is the
technology. Where does the product fit? Will it add, will it be synergistic or will it be
just an addendum? I have a diagnostic company
that I follow, its not a biotech company, its called Cardio Dynamics (Symbol:
CDIC). I love that company, and I give them a
Strong Buy. Would you want a catheter
passed up through your groin for an angiogram or would you prefer four sensors placed on
your chest, and your heart condition monitored. I
would rather the sensors, and Cardio Dynamics. This
wonderful little machine has four sensors, two for the neck and two for the chest. You can get all of the heart parameters that allow
you to figure out what is wrong with the patients heart, using a noninvasive technology. GE is selling their product on the market. Theres another company called Imatron Inc. (NASD: IMAT) which I give a buy to, who used to have alliances with Seamans. For a couple of years they were almost treated like the pariah. Seamans dictated all of the terms and said they were going are going to sell your instrument this way and their marketing strategy was wrong. When Imatron distanced itself from Seamans it faced a tremendous uphill battle. In October, Opera had a show in which she had a complete heart condition diagnosis on the Imatron scanner. They have gotten about sixteen hundred calls per day now since that show, because there scanner is almost fifteen times faster than the GE scanner. What it does is it takes a picture of your heart and arteries in 3D slices, and it comes up with a calcium count. You might have a normal cholesterol and lipid level, but there might still be plaque in your arteries. The plaque deposition happens in conjugation with the lipids and the amount of calcium in your system. Therefore, Imatron came up with what is called the calcium score that indicates whether you have heart disease, or whether you have a predisposition towards heart disease. Its almost a prognostic instrument. If you have a high calcium score, then you can change your life style so that you dont develop a plaque deposition. They are now selling it by themselves, and they are doing a great job. They are turning profitable. Theyve just started marketing it themselves within the last year and a half. They have a fabulous World Wide sales VP, Jack Marquess, and President, Terry Ross who has invested about three million dollars of his own money into the company. Theyve been selling almost seven or eight instruments per quarter, and these instruments cost about two million dollars a piece. People dont buy these instruments on a shopping spree, but theyve been able to sell them and they are making money. Both Cardio Dynamics and Imatron have fabulous management. To me management is number one. Cardio Dynamics has dynamic management. They have the best thing for getting regulatory approval. I would say that they have the best mechanism for a small company that Ive ever seen. CEOCFOinterviews - Of the companies
that you cover, which are situated the best with their cash and credit. Ms. Wagle
Targeted Genetics has set up all of these alliances with these large pharmaceutical
firms who have very deep pockets. A Phase I
trial cannot only last about twelve to eighteen months but it can also cost anywhere from
one million to three million dollars. Therefore,
a biotech company needs a strong force of cash, to finance all of this Phase I, Phase II
and Phase III trials, all of these studies at these different hospitals, which expect to
be paid. For the small biotech companies
such as Abbott Laboratories (NYSE: ABT), Merk & Co, Inc. (NYSE: MRK), or Pfizer Inc.
(NYSE: PFE) , American Home Products (NYSE: AHP) can provide that. So, the alliances that Targeted Genetics has
made will prove to be very profitable in that they will be paid in mile stone payments. Many times there is an up front payment, a mile
stone payment, and then royalties and licenses along the way. What has happened with these large companies is
that theyve gotten to the point where they have all of these successful drugs, and
other drugs in their R&D pipeline, but many of them dont have the biotechnology
know how, in house. So the large companies
are giving out a helping hand to the smaller companies who are more entrepreneurial and
coming up with the new drugs, but need the money. The
large companies provide the money in an agreement, which allows them to license and market
the new technology. In a way, it proves to be
profitable for both and many times, if the small company is smart they will form these
alliances, because to get to the size of a Pfizer and a Merk, didnt come within a
few years. They also have fabulous
distribution systems in place, to which the smaller companies dont have any access. It would be easier for an Abbott or a Merk to sell
their liaisons drug to a hospital or doctor because they generally will only have
ten minutes to make the sale and the doctor will most likely listen to the larger company
with the proven track record. CEOCFOinterviews - Can you tell us
about ABAXIS, which is another diagnostic device company that you cover? Ms. Wagle
ABAXIS, (Nasdaq: ABAX) under Clint Severson and Don Parker have had the shrewd
management to guide them into the vet arena. They
have this little instrument, and they realized that they could get these little
instruments into the vet market without the chloride test.
They went in, capitalized and have done a fabulous job. There is plenty of room for
ABAXIS to grow in the Vet arena, and continue to build value. To get more instruments in there, with the passage
of time ABAXIS may have to make their prices more competitive, both for their instruments
and for their discs. Currently people are
buying their VetScan, a point-of-care blood analyzer because ABAXIS has made a name for
them, but as with any industry, there comes competition and the lowering of prices. They really have the advantage of gaining more
market share because of the quality of the product and the Vets like it. They have quite a few sales people of their own
along with distribution partners in Europe. CEOCFOinterviews - What are your
recommendations for the companies that you cover? Ms. Wagle
ABAXIS is in the category of a Strong Buy because of the way that
theyve garnered market share and increased production capacity. They are also establishing a customer service and
a technical service, which is very crucial when a company gets to the size that ABAXIS is.
Customers want the feeling of reassurance that there is someone, whom they can call; in
the case, that something goes wrong. Along
with the VetScan the customer must also purchase consumable rotors in order to analyze the
blood. Right now, they are in their new
production facility, which will allow them to meet customer demand for those rotors. That should do well for them in the Vet market. Their success in the human market depends on an
alliance with a big house and if they can add the chloride test which is necessary for
that market and have it approved. Targeted Genetics would be a Strong
Buy right now with all of their alliances. Their
products are in Phase II and Phase III trials, and they are making the right connections
at the proper time. They also have a good
R&D department headed by a strong Vice President, Barrie J. Carter, and Ph.D. You need all of these mechanisms in place before
you can go anywhere. For biotech investors,
its a long waiting process. Do not
expect any earning, do not expect any dividends, but the companies valuations generally go
up at the end of the Phase II and throughout the Phase III trials, and the stock can go up
tremendously. CEOCFOinterviews - Are there any
other companies which you may have a buy or strong buy on? Ms. Wagle I
would like to tell you about IMPATH Inc. (NASD: IMPH). What IMPATH has done is that there are many
cancers, which are hard to diagnose in a small hospital or academic institution. With
cancer one of the important things is getting to the root.
To treat a cancer you have to know where the primary site of the cancer is. Many
times when you find a cancer it has started to metastasize. About fifteen percent of cancers in general are
what you would call tumors
of unknown origin. IMPATH is company, which
is made up of a group of pathologists and oncologist.
If you go into a small county hospital the oncologist or the family practice
physician, after sending the sample to their lab, still doesnt know what the primary
origin of the tumor is, they can send the sample to IMPATH via FedEx. IMPATH with its team of pathologists and
oncologist gives its diagnostic and prognostic information on the cancer and gets
back to the physician in approximately about forty eight hours. With a tumor, the more aggressive the tumor is the
greater the chance that it will recur. The
slower growing tumors have a lesser risk of recurring.
In general, the maximum amount of money spent is when a tumor continues to recur. Therefore, the best thing would be to stop the
tumor at the very beginning and IMPATH with their service in diagnostics is a fast turn
around time. This fast turnaround time gives
these physicians the options of going ahead with an aggressive treatment for the tumor. Up front the treatment may be more expensive, but
if you can stop it from recurring, you will lower the long term cost, which could be
greater. IMPATH has that service and
they also have a huge database. It has linked
up with a large number of hospitals and has a whole database of diagnostic and prognostic
profiles, treatment and outcome data. So if
you want to look at certain outcome data, they can provide that information and hospitals
can license this software. The third arena
that they are in is because of all of the names that they have. IMPATH gets six hundred samples a day for testing. Therefore, their database is up to about six
hundred and fifty thousand cancer profiles in their database. Only five percent of cancer patients in the U.S.
are in that kind of clinical trial. What
IMPATH does is work with the biopharma companies, and helps them get the right patient
profiles into their clinical trials. Therefore,
it performs a service that is extremely unique. Because
of all of the profiles in its database it can for example, go to a Genentech, Inc.
(NYSE: DNA), and if they are doing a new study on breast cancer, IMPATH can offer the
names of ten women with the profiles that they are looking for. I think that is how IMPATH is building up their
business niche. It not only provides the
diagnostics and prognostic lab services, it also has a database of information and
its capitalizing on its database of information by providing it to the genomic
companies. CEOCFOinterviews - And what is you
recommendation on them? Ms. Wagle
Its a buy right now because their stock has been on a tear. Its gone up eight to eighty in the last
eight months. CEOCFOinterviews - What thought
would you like to leave the investment community? Ms. Wagle If investors buy a biotech or diagnostic device company at the end of Phase I trials, when you know the product is going to work, and they have the patients to wait for another six to seven years, it usually will pay off. Technology
Technology Delphi Group Ten Post Office Square Carl Frappaolo Interview conducted by: CEOCFOinteriviews.com January 2001
Mr. Frappaolo (cf@delphigroup.com) is the industrys leading
authority on the challenges of integrating technology and business goals when designing
information management strategies for knowledge sharing and collaboration. Mr. Frappaolo
has assisted many enterprises, large and small, strategize approaches for enterprise-wide
knowledge, e-learning and information management, many of which begin with a 'knowledge
audit' of their organization. He has authored over 100 studies on the technology of
digital documents and regularly provides market commentary and analysis to leading
industry periodicals and business magazines, including Forbes, The
Wall Street Journal, Intelligent Enterprise, Knowledge
Management Magazine, Computerworld, InformationWeek, CIO, INFORM's eDOC, and The Review. He is the
co-creator of Delphis Knowledge Management Methodology (KM2), and Portal
Design methodology. He is also the author of two books, Electronic Document Management Systems: A Portable
Consultant, an extensive text that analyzes the role of the electronic document as the
cornerstone of todays knowledge-based paradigm of computing (McGraw-Hill, 1995); and
Smart Things to Know About Knowledge Management,
the leading primer on this business paradigm (Capstone, 1999). CEOCFOinterviews Mr. Frappaolo, please
give us a brief history of the Delphi Group. Mr. Frappaolo
Delphi Group was founded twelve years ago at
what we thought was a very critical point in the history of information technology. We saw evolving in the marketplace, a family of
technologies that were going to seriously impact the ways in which corporations manage
unstructured information. This is information that
doesnt fit nicely into a relational database -- for example, documents, pictures and images. We
established the company to be vigilant on the new ways in which information technology was
impacting how businesses operate. By keeping
our focus there, Delphi Group, over the last twelve years, has introduced many
organizations to concepts of document management, workflow systems, business process
analysis, knowledge management, just in time e-learning, and business portals. Today we are talking about issues like, on-line
communities and collaborative commerce. We
see these as connected by their ability to affect a business approach to information
management. We are more focused on the
business application than on the technology itself. The
service we provide is a vigilance for the next new technology that will have an immediate
impact on businesses. We are visionaries. We
introduce corporate America, and global enterprises, to what is coming so they can plan
ahead wisely. We tell our clients how that technology marketplace is shaping up, who the
leaders of that market are/will be and how these organizations should be evaluating the
products coming from those vendors. CEOCFOinterviews How is your
information distributed? Mr. Frappaolo
Our information is distributed through three separate product lines: research,
education and consulting. We do our own primary market research. That information is
distributed to clients via a website, where users are able to interact with the
information published in an electronic format. We
also publish paper-based versions of the information for our clients who still prefer
paper. We also condense our knowledge into
educational seminars, and conferences. These are live-, community-focused events. We are
also adding new ways to participate in these educational events through innovative
web-based access. Lastly we provide hands-on
business consulting where we go into organizations and do a very targeted, focused
discovery of business needs, and how these are or are not met by the organization's
technology direction.. We follow that with a report that details what the organization
specifically needs to do to integrate technology with their business strategies. CEOCFOinterviews What types of clients
need your service? Mr. Frappaolo
Our client list runs the spectrum of the Whos Who in the Global 1,000, and
leading government agencies. We have worked
with companies such as Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Smithklein Beecham, Bristol Meyer Squib,
American Family, American Express, Clorox, and National Life of Vermont. We are providing information to these companies
that is helping them reshape their organizations through the effective application of new technologies. We do continuous research on
emerging technology areas through a separate branch at Delphi. We are market sentinels, watching for emerging
technologies that solve business problems in the areas of information, knowledge and
business value chains. A recent example is the business portal. From our work with end
users and vendors in the area of knowledge management, we saw the seeds of the business
portal emerging. We dedicated a team of analysts to identify the vendors that are starting
to introduce solutions targeted at the knowledge worker's need for a single and personal
point of contact -- a starting screen on their computer -- that would link them to all the
information resources they used in a typical business day. We learned everything there is
to know about the technology and the vendors and the business cases for portals. We then internalized that and evaluated whether or
not there is a legitimate business need for it. Once
we were certain there was, we defined the business need and architected a methodology to
help businesses evaluate technology providers. CEOCFOinterviews It sounds as though
your website would have valuable information for investors and shareholders of publicly
traded technology companies. Mr. Frappaolo Investors
and shareholders of publicly traded technology companies could gain tremendous insight
because what we do in the market research is to assess an entire marketplace. Therefore, an investor interested in a tech stock
could learn about the demand for the technology family they are investing in (or
considering investing) and that could lead to more than one stock selection. They'd learn the potential size of that
marketplace, whether there are commercial verticals that find this technology attractive,
and who is the typical buyer. An investor
would learn about the forces driving this marketplace and determine who are the market
leaders from a solutions provider viewpoint. It is the kind of information they'd use to
assess whether or not the public companies theyve invested in have a strong current
standing in the market place, who their toughest competition is, and what makes them
competitive. CEOCFOinterviews Does the Delphi Group
have any competitors? Mr. Frappaolo
We are not the only company in the world that does assessments of technology
vendors, but we believe we are a unique organization in our ability to focus exclusively
on how information and the way it is manipulated technically, impact the business' value
chain... We do not believe that there is any other consultancy that focuses only on that
area and for that reason we believe that we do it deeper than anyone else We understand
the knowledge management, the portal, the e learning, the business process and the
document space better than anyone out there, because its an exclusive focus for
us. What has spelled
Delphis success over the last twelve years is our very keen sense for the next big
technology wave. Earlier, when I introduced
Delphi, I said that we started out looking at imaging and text search engines. Indeed
twelve years ago, that was leading edge, though at the time, there was little momentum,
very few companies were using the technology, and most were bewildered as to why they
would even need it. We did not allow
ourselves though to stay imaging and text search engines specialists, although there is
still a need for that and we continue to do a fair amount of consulting in that area.
Today, when you look at Delphi Group's market research and education, we are light years
beyond that first technology focus. Delphi
Group has been successful through the years because we are able to identify the next
killer technology early in the game and frame it in a perspective that is clearly
understood in the business environment. Weve
been right on for twelve years. Search Engines were a successful market place, but they
are not the bleeding edge anymore. We were
dead right again with Document Management. Throughout the 1990s we were the premier
resource for guidance on workflow, Business Process Redesign and Knowledge Management
(KM). We have a successful track record of
knowing where the next big impact from technology is going to be. CEOCFOinterviews What is the big,
impact technology of the future? Mr. Frappaolo The
next thing that Delphi is working on is the concept of Collaborative Commerce, e-Community
Building, and the Wireless Organization. Too
often, when people hear wireless they think, oh thats old, youre talking
about using PDAs, cell phones to access the web. Actually thats a very
small piece of it. Delphi is looking at what the work world will look like when the
reality of a wireless workforce has been achieved. What kind of applications are going to
be running in that wireless network? How is that going to change the way your employees
are located, how they get their jobs done, and how they are compensated? We are looking at information delivery vehicles,
process management vehicles, and how they will operate in a wireless environment. CEOCFOinterviews How many companies are
in that area? Mr. Frappaolo I
would say that there are somewhere in the neighborhood of fifty or sixty companies that
are doing R&D, or have announced or are planning to announce availability in the
wireless space. CEOCFOinterviews When do you see a big
push in the product area? Mr. Frappaolo
Possibly in another eight to twelve months. You
are hearing a little of it right now, but you will hear a great deal more over the next
twelve months. CEOCFOinterviews Could you tell us more
about e-Communities? Mr. Frappaolo
The idea of e- Communities is really interesting and powerful. It is going to start
off somewhat simply, as a way for organizations to better leverage their intellectual
capital. In very large multinational
organizations, for example, it is impossible for anyone to track what each individual in
that company knows. Many of our clients tell
us about incidents where, for example, their people in Japan just came out with a
wonderful new invention only to find out that the folks in the UK have been working on the
same thing for the past eight months. Neither group knew of the other, so there was no
information sharing of any kind! The
challenge facing larger organizations is how do we share what our people know
collectively, and how do we broker our people so that teams are not constrained by
physical location, but rather united by common interests, experience, and vision? And
finally, how do we build "communities that collaborate" and share knowledge,
resources, information within our dispersed organizations?
That in and of itself is pretty fascinating and it is starting to evolve. When we
talk about e-Communities, we see not just that, but also how can the organization start
applying that knowledge and information-sharing expertise outside of its corporate walls.
e-Communities will really test current business models. This gets deeply into the concept
of extended value chains -- how do you start brokering your intellectual capital with the
intellectual capital of partners, suppliers, customers and, dare we say, the competition? But think about it, if you and your competition
start working together and sharing what you know via these communities of like-minded
individuals perhaps -- in the end, you may jointly own certain rights to certain
technologies or products collectively. You
are therefore a competitor in one sense and a cooperator in another. That is more in line with what we envision
longterm when we say e-Community. It takes a
particular type of CxO to appreciate what this could lead to and what it means. Companies such as Dailmer Chrysler, Ford and
GM.are showing evidence of a similar vision. They
think the automobile market is big enough and it is going to become even bigger. If by working with their competitors, they can
grow the marketplace as a whole, they will see bigger profits in a shorter period. They will take what they have discovered in
automobile safety for example, and share that with the competition, so that the automobile
industry, from a safety standpoint, advances more quickly. Buyers will purchase different
types of automobiles, growing the market at a greater speed. Daimler Chrysler can then internally make sure
that their products account for a certain percent of that market." CEOCFOinterviews What type of research
do you provide on the technology suppliers? Mr. Frappaolo We dont just
look at their technology, we look at the management team behind the company, their profit
and loss track record, their standing in the community amongst the buyers and evaluators
of their market space. CEOCFOinterviews How is that
information displayed on you website? Mr. Frappaolo It is displayed
via annotated charts and graphs, which contrast and compare elements in the market place. It is also portrayed in bodies of text and
paragraphs, which position the vendor company within their market space as well as within
their technology arena.. This will soon be merged into a personalized portal
environment. CEOCFOinterviews What types of services
can you offer a CEO. Mr. Frappaolo The CEOs we work
with fall into two broad groups: CEOs of technology companies, and CEOs of companies who
use technology to make their company better, leaner and smarter at what they do. With the latter group, we work with the CEOs to
build and formulate a Business/Technical strategy that ensures they are using technology
to leverage their intellectual capital to the nth degree, so that they achieve their
marketplace goals and objectives more readily. When
we work with the CEO of a technology company, or one who is thinking of becoming the CEO
of a technology company, (and weve done both), we help them clarify their value
proposition and determine what their chances of success look like. We help them understand the competitive
marketplace into which they are going to be playing. We evaluate what it would take for
them to succeed. We'll also review their product vision.
If they already have a product, we can rate it on a feature-by-feature basis, to
give them a sense of how competitive it might be and what the user community's reaction
would be. We see many new products that
have some very nice features, but if the user community isnt interested in them, it
won't spell market success. CEOCFOinterviews We would like to close
by letting our readers know that Mr. Frappaolo is available for public speaking on the
following topics: Survival in the Knowledge-based Economy, The Empowered Document,
Information Management in the 21st Century, Building Effective e-Communities,
eLearning, Content Management, Knowledge Management, and Business Process Redesign.
Mr. Frappaolo Thank you for this
opportunity. The
Delphi 100 The Delphi 100 is a list of leading publicly-held B2B,
e-content, e-learning, and wireless companies. The total number of companies on the list
may change from time to time based on performance and other factors. The Delphi 100 can be
found online at, www.delphi100.com.
February 2001 Services
The
Kriegsman Group Steven A. Kriegsman Interview conducted by: CEOCFOinterviews - Mr.
Kriegsman, can you tell us about the Kriegsman Group? "We take a very analytical
approach in looking at individual companies and studying the industry, but we are
basically interested in undervalued firms. Our
specialty is finding companies with stock prices under $10-15. We do merger and acquisition work; we arrange
strategic alliances; we assist both public and private companies with raising equity and
debt; we write research reports and help those companies in increasing shareholder value. Additionally, we manage money, act as advisors to
several fund groups and represent wealthy families interested in investing in the health
care sector. We have a number of excellent
professionals in the company, including managing directors and analysts, many with very
substantial educational backgrounds at some of the finest universities. One of our key people is an M.D., M.B.A., Ph.D.
out of Wharton and UCLA. We are able to
attract very talented people." "In addition to being a full
service investment and merchant bank, we start companies with our own capital and move
them along to an IPO or a private placement. We
recently invested and started a genomics company, which we think will become one of the
most successful in the world. We put in a
total of $2 million, brought in a President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Technology
Officer, a blue chip Board of Directors, including a Nobel Laureate in Medicine, Dr. Louis
Ignarro from UCLA. The Vice Chairman of our
Scientific Advisory board is Dr. Michael Hayden, one of the worlds leading genomics
experts. We think we will capture a
tremendous amount of market share in the genomics field, which right now, is a very
important field in biotech. "Miravant Medical Technologies
(NASDAQ: MRVT) is also currently very undervalued. Their stock has come down from about
$30 to only $8. This company has probably the
best technology in the world to treat age related macular degeneration. We expect
their product to reach the market next year and it could be the leading product in the
world." "Then there is Cytomedix (OTC
BB:CYDX). They have a patented technology for wound closure. If you have diabetic ulcers
and face amputation, their product will let you avoid drastic surgery. I think this
company is very undervalued at about $3. They need to raise additional capital and
have been successful in doing so in the past. They have agood management team and I
think their stock will rebound tremendously." "Also, there is Siga Technologies, (NASDAQ: SIGA) a leading company in vaccines. They are a very interesting, early stage company with very good technologies and undervalued at $3." CEOCFOinterviews What is your thoughts on the management
team of CEOCFOinterviews - How does HEARx market their
product? CEOCFOinterviews What is the outlook for
the medical e-commerce
March 2001
|
ceocfointerviews.com does not purchase or
make
recommendation on stocks based on the interviews published.